Classic movie site with rare images, original ads, and behind-the-scenes photos, with informative and insightful commentary. We like to have fun with movies!
Archive and Links
grbrpix@aol.com
Search Index Here




Tuesday, December 24, 2024

Spun Off Greenbriar Book, Showmen, Sell It Hot #1

 


Showmen: Back to Oz, Ads That Winked, Ramon Rouses, and Iced Air Meets Vaudeville

THE WIZARD OF OZ in 1949 --- 1949 is understood to be when The Wizard of Oz went finally into profit. The “Masterpiece Reprint” as tendered by Metro collected one million in domestic rentals, $787,000 in foreign rentals, and posted $1.1 million in worldwide profit. Expense included a fresh campaign and prints, ads spun around current doings of the star cast now bigger stars than ten years before, Ray Bolger, Bert Lahr, and Jack Haley active and distinct marquee assets along with “never better” Judy Garland nearing end of her MGM employment. The Masterpiece Reprints were initiated after WWII to cover what otherwise might be product shortage for Leo, fulfill requests for certain oldies, and hopefully secure first-run money for the best of them. MGM sold these like new releases, terms no different from features fresh out of labs. The Wizard of Oz had lost money in 1939 but would not now. The million gain suggested an evergreen in the making, confirmation being a 1955 encore on ersatz “wide screens,” response again rosy to tune of $448K in domestic rentals, $483K foreign, and $577K in profit columns. Lease to CBS for a single broadcast the following year plus option for more suggested library stock could thrive on networks, one executive however reminding colleagues that there was only one Wizard of Oz, and don’t expect others to perform so well. Right he was, otherwise we might have had Meet Me in St. Louis annually along with any number of MGM musicals on a same basis, but again, and understood by all, there was no place like Oz.

Back for 1955 Dates, This Time on Ersatz Wide Screens

The Wizard of Oz has tumbled from specialness it had. What was yearly event on networks would become periodic filler on TCM. Theatrical saw Oz through a first half of seventies placement alongside whatever else might appeal to youngsters as part of a series that was MGM Children’s Matinee. Prints were new, if not so vibrant on Eastman stock, this mattering less to viewers many of which had for years been seeing Oz in black-and-white at home. Home video by the late seventies allowed fans to record The Wizard of Oz and watch endless from there, MGM/UA obliged to if possible improve image and sound so they could offer something special on cassette to diehards. “Restoration” became a byword, Oz a precious pearl to polish and keep on polishing. They’d even revive the old Technicolor dye-transfer process for a nineties reissue, anything to suggest something like we’d not seen before. A more recent wild card was The Wizard of Oz in 3-D, surprisingly good at least to mine eyes, Oz an ideal subject for depth per rich foregrounds in most every scene, compositions circa 1939 seeming to look toward three-dimension future. One could watch Oz in 3-D and not go back to Kansas again, Warners arguing against that with yet further enhance that is 4K. Where now possible to lay depth and clarity like this to any title, how about King Kong, The Adventures of Robin Hood, any of a hundred we could name at random? I notice even The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari available on 4K from Kino. Where indeed do we go from here?

HER HIGHNESS AND THE BELLBOY (1945) --- Faint cause to recall this, unless Lamarr is one’s dish, or comedy less funny but typical of time when MGM mostly bungled at the genre. So why mention Her Highness and the Bellboy? I say for ways it was sold, one here from hundreds offered in 1945. Technique was varied as theatres using a same attraction, no two ways a same. Management had to learn their audience and how it was likeliest to jump. Her Highness and the Bellboy was Hedy Lamarr and little else, ongoing bane of ordinary Metro product dependent on stars to prop formula few would care about otherwise. Lamarr was for sex but they couldn’t all be White Cargo, her acting as in H.M. Pulham Esq. no arrow toward future things. She’d stay statuary or exotic as in forbiddingly so. Lamarr as “Tondelayo” or Robert Taylor’s ill-advised consort in Lady of the Tropics lured respective men to doom, otherness baked in thanks to Lamarr’s otherworld beauty and accent to further a distance. To do comedy saw her still remote as a Princess thawed by Robert Walker’s Bellboy who translates slang and jive-talks for her as cameras caress. To sell meant to suggest, not what an audience would get, but what they wished they could get. Chicago’s Apollo Theatre teases with time-honed art of stars winking at what turns out to be nothing at all. Peruse of myriad ads from this period sees the device in common, if commonplace, use. Idea was to imply coupling to follow Hedy’s “Royal Command to Love,” Bob bashful, “… but could he give room service!” Anyone who regularly went to movies knew winks and saucy asides meant no more than they would in humdrum real life, but hope sprang eternal that perhaps this time things would be different. At least laughs might compensate for empty promise of ads. Her Highness and the Bellboy doubled its negative cost in US rentals alone, plus foreign, to generate $916K in profit. Beware Bob as role model, however, “Hey, Angel Puss! Hey Toots! Let’s Smooch!” likelier in real life to provoke a punch in the snoot.


PRIVATE NUMBER and RAMON NOVARRO --- What would our perception of Ramon Novarro have been in 1936? I mean seeing him live on the Chicago stage singing and dancing with his own “pretentious” (why that word?) revue cast, including song-and-dance sister Carmen Novarro. Here was Ben-Hur himself live! Novarro wanted to sing more than act. He built a theatre, in fact an outbuilding adjunct to his house, where he’d perform for friends and show movies. MGM preferred Novarro romantic, but his was more a specialized and non-formulaic appeal. He’d last on stages so long as there were those who’d remember him from movies. Latter-day Metro hired him to play Mexican grandees, RKO having a spot for him as police investigating R. Mitchum in The Big Steal. He even turned up years later on a Wild, Wild West episode, which I looked at and thought Isn’t that Ben-Hur from fotos in Brownlow’s The Parade’s Gone By book? Novarro has Roy Smeck as music support for the ’36 Chicago engagement, Smeck familiar for being among first Vitaphone recitals, so good with guitar that manufacturers named a model after him. Smeck laid the instrument on his lap and plucked same sitting down, his and other old Vitaphones where great performing is at. Feature-in-support on Chicago occasion was Private Number, which Greenbriar visited before. Note how Chicago misinforms on it. “Ardent … unquenchable … dangerous!” One thing to lie, but why so forcefully? “Backstairs love” implies acts explicit, 1936 a least likely of years for that. A then-public understood economic imperative to exaggerate. Robert Taylor and Loretta Young promised nothing apart from clinch piled upon clinch, him a “millionaire’s son” and her “common clay.” Enough said it seems, but Private Number needed more than those 80 minutes as fair exchange for admissions, thus a Ramon Novarro or in smaller situations, a co-feature or oodles of shorts to make dimes please like dollars.


NOW OR NEVER plus VAUDEVILLE --- Not sure where this particular Majestic Theatre was located, but it’s sure “Iced Air” was the sell, theirs “The coolest spot in town!” This was 1921, early for air conditioning as we’d know it, 1925 occasion for a first installation at the Rivoli Theatre in Times Square. Efforts prior to that amounted to electric fans, these often blown through frozen blocks to achieve “iced air” effect, ersatz AC better than swelter in summer and often houses closed when heat was severest. The Majestic was “Big Time Vaudeville” plus “First Run Feature Pictures,” Never Weaken a “feature” for purpose of placement at top of that week’s program, “funny, bespeckled grinning laugh-maker” that was Harold Lloyd, a half hour of him basis for fifteen, thirty-five, fifty cent admissions, depending on time of day and age of patrons. Nola St. Claire is among distant past that is vaudeville, no movies using her it seems, nor Wiki to mark her coming or eventual going. There are those who intimately know vaudeville long gone out with tide, but I’m not among them. Suffice that Nola led the ensemble that was ventriloquism, a “humorous trickster sawing a lemon in half,” which raises query if lemons were harder to halve in 1921, Sherrie Mathews with “Personality Plus” and turning out to be a man, in fact a man who died selfsame year he appeared at the Majestic. Hazel Moran works here with lariats, was known too for “a running fire of chatter.” Hazel claimed to be the only woman spinning eighty-five feet of rope on stage. For the record, her act generally lasted six minutes. Too bad we could never reclaim any of these entertainers unless they dipped in films, many doing so, but far from all, and so far as I know, none of these.

7 Comments:

Blogger Filmfanman said...

Never watched "Wizard of Oz" until I was older, on DVD decades ago, and I wasn't very impressed; but more recently I was able to get a 3D bluray at a low price, and eventually watched it - and I agree, it looked very good and I found it rather more enjoyable in 3D, which surprised me a little.
Perhaps it became visually interesting enough to me for it to overcome its plot shortcomings as a children's film and that's why I enjoyed it more in that format.

8:42 AM  
Blogger Reg Hartt said...

Don't forget WIZARD OF OZ to Pink Floyd's DARK SIDE OF THE MOON. I used OWL3D to create a 3D version of KING KONG. Wow! Absolutely WOW! Does it need 3D? No. Does 3D enhance it? Ob boy, yes. This is a remarkable technology we can get for just $10 a month.

10:37 AM  
Blogger Reg Hartt said...

I thought before I saw it that in keeping with the move to Technicolor when we arrive in Oz 3D would be limited to that section which would have made sense. The whole film in in 3D. On my big 150 inch screen it is wonderful. Not complaining.

12:44 PM  
Blogger DBenson said...

Are evergreen event movies gone for good? Not only "Wizard of Oz", but "Ben Hur", "Gone With the Wind", and most of the once-airtight Disney vault, for generations re-released to theaters and then carefully protected from too much television exposure. Now, they're viewed year round on disc, cable, streams, and whatever else is brewing.

Recalling when the introduction to the Leonard Maltin movie guide would assert, emphatically, that GWTW was NOT coming to television that year. As if it were a joke to think it ever would. Also recalling when the original "Star Wars" finally made it to network television and was ballyhooed as an Event, prefaced by tuxedoed stars and searchlights. As if there were any fans who hadn't seen it repeatedly on every other media.

Yes, I love having access to and even ownership of films you once had to wait for, whether in re-release or mutilated for a late-night television slot. But one wishes there was a way to recapture the sense of a shared event.

2:51 AM  
Blogger Reg Hartt said...

When GONE WITH THE WIND first aired on TV Stores ran out of video casettes as folks were eager to preserve it. Many erased their tapes as once they had it the sheen was gone with the wind. Movies are at their best when for me when I see them not with friends talking over what we are watching but with absolute strangers glued to the screen.

11:31 AM  
Blogger EricSwede said...

Regarding the vaudevillians at the Majestic, Nola St. Claire (real name Nola Margaret Miller) was the mother of Jack Mercer who was the voice of Popeye from 1935 to 1980. She appeared (uncredited) in a Ruth Etting Vitaphone short "Along Came Ruth" (1933). She and husband, Bennett Kilburn Mercer were married on stage in Indiana. As for (Emil)Jarrow, from Wiki - During the early 1920s when the stage illusion of "Sawing A Woman in Half" was at the peak of its popularity, Jarrow wryly billed his act as "Sawing a Lemon In Half." Artificial Intelligence describes the trick as follows-"The Bill in Lemon is a magic trick where a magician makes a borrowed object appear inside a sealed item, like a lemon. It's considered one of the strongest magic tricks and is often performed with a bill or card." Other variations are with an orange and a coin. I picked up your two books this year. Really enjoy them. The history of vaudeville, and many nightclub performers, is not too well remembered these days. Always fun to root around the archives looking things up. You really have to dig though.
I took a kid who was obsessed w/OZ to that 1999 re-issue and it was a dud. A 4x3 image shrunk down to fit in the middle of a multiplex screen? Even then my TV at home was a better experience. It reminded me of going to the Chicago Bozo show in the mid 1960s. The cartoons we saw at home were played on three small monitors (one for each of the circus rings), you couldn't see anything-like watching TV from the neighbors back yard through a window. Bah. At least they gave us Bun candy bars on the way out. Another time they gave us frozen chocolate covered bananas. Happy New Year Greenbriar!

2:21 PM  
Blogger John McElwee said...

Thank you very much for sharing all this great information, Eric, and Happy New Year.

6:25 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

grbrpix@aol.com
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • May 2010
  • June 2010
  • July 2010
  • August 2010
  • September 2010
  • October 2010
  • November 2010
  • December 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • April 2011
  • May 2011
  • June 2011
  • July 2011
  • August 2011
  • September 2011
  • October 2011
  • November 2011
  • December 2011
  • January 2012
  • February 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2012
  • May 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • August 2012
  • September 2012
  • October 2012
  • November 2012
  • December 2012
  • January 2013
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • April 2013
  • May 2013
  • June 2013
  • July 2013
  • August 2013
  • September 2013
  • October 2013
  • November 2013
  • December 2013
  • January 2014
  • February 2014
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • June 2014
  • July 2014
  • August 2014
  • September 2014
  • October 2014
  • November 2014
  • December 2014
  • January 2015
  • February 2015
  • March 2015
  • April 2015
  • May 2015
  • June 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • September 2015
  • October 2015
  • November 2015
  • December 2015
  • January 2016
  • February 2016
  • March 2016
  • April 2016
  • May 2016
  • June 2016
  • July 2016
  • August 2016
  • September 2016
  • October 2016
  • November 2016
  • December 2016
  • January 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2017
  • June 2017
  • July 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2017
  • October 2017
  • November 2017
  • December 2017
  • January 2018
  • February 2018
  • March 2018
  • April 2018
  • May 2018
  • June 2018
  • July 2018
  • August 2018
  • September 2018
  • October 2018
  • November 2018
  • December 2018
  • January 2019
  • February 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2019
  • May 2019
  • June 2019
  • July 2019
  • August 2019
  • September 2019
  • October 2019
  • November 2019
  • December 2019
  • January 2020
  • February 2020
  • March 2020
  • April 2020
  • May 2020
  • June 2020
  • July 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2020
  • October 2020
  • November 2020
  • December 2020
  • January 2021
  • February 2021
  • March 2021
  • April 2021
  • May 2021
  • June 2021
  • July 2021
  • August 2021
  • September 2021
  • October 2021
  • November 2021
  • December 2021
  • January 2022
  • February 2022
  • March 2022
  • April 2022
  • May 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2022
  • August 2022
  • September 2022
  • October 2022
  • November 2022
  • December 2022
  • January 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2023
  • May 2023
  • June 2023
  • July 2023
  • August 2023
  • September 2023
  • October 2023
  • November 2023
  • December 2023
  • January 2024
  • February 2024
  • March 2024
  • April 2024
  • May 2024
  • June 2024
  • July 2024
  • August 2024
  • September 2024
  • October 2024
  • November 2024
  • December 2024
  • January 2025