Watch List for 3/3/2025
![]() |
Overlook Veronica if You Will, But Know She is Great in This |
Watched: So Proudly We Hail, Mystery Street, Reckless, and Gideon's Day
SO PROUDLY WE HAIL (1943) --- Most striking character of this is gone after a first half. Veronica Lake has been called an expressionless player, and worse. She was said to be difficult. There is evidence she was mentally ill. Her finish was grisly. Lake got revived when glamour portraits of old stars became a thing, as in gallery-hung and collectible. Lush and hung down hair was her ticket early on, but where she swept back, as was case later, people wondered what had made her special to begin with. What for me makes Lake unique is intense work she gives So Proudly We Hail, so intense in fact that I suspect she channeled what was troubled self to be doomed character “Lt. Olivia D’Arcy.” Beside her, Claudette Colbert, Paulette Goddard, the rest, seem artificial and actorly as in this studio-set depiction with no war happening beyond walls. From Lake it emerges true to fusion between herself and tortured Olivia, and I for one was sorry when she cashed in for sake of nurse colleagues (and what an exit). Seems I read Lake was a pill during Proudly and that may have just been her as early and unaware applicator of technique later celebrated as Method. Actors did pay a price for living parts too deeply, considering not a few were unstable to begin with. Colbert as den mother is more typecast, as is Goddard on glam duty, and I understand these two clashed if mildly as to how and where cameras were pointed. Was Paulette really born in 1910? I sort of suspect it was earlier and maybe she hid that. So Proudly We Hail is where we get Sonny Tufts first as a star, much by way of mannerisms that he’d adjust later as noir dweller and make scarily effective. George Reeves looked like a next very big thing and director Mark Sandrich promised him a bright postwar future, but then Sandrich died with George mustered out to do small parts, even bits, then serials, then Superman. Was this very capable actor robbed? So Proudly We Hail has some of most terrifying siege stuff put to film during wartime. We feel vividly horrors awaiting troops and nurses left on islands taken by the enemy. I was wrung out after these two hours and can only imagine what it did to crowds in 1943.
![]() |
Future Wrath-ful Khan Gets Tips from Tarzan |
MYSTERY STREET (1950) --- Somewhere it was forum-claimed that a thing called “DVD rot” is wrecking our discs, so I got out alleged victim Mystery Street from WB to see if fears have basis. Mine played OK, at least the feature did, but extras got pixilated and wouldn’t access, so should we worry over past purchases? Checking each start to finish would take longer than I’ll live and who’d really want to watch some of these titles again? Mystery Street however is a jewel among smaller noirs, a nervous A for $729K Metro spent, but splendidly made as expected from the Lion. As police procedural it is keen and even novel, for here was forensic explore of evidence fairly new to movies and not before dealt with in such detail. We’re since sick of saturation, as in how many years has CSI lasted?, but Mystery Street serving fresh and relative first had not just novelty in its kit, but fascination for forensics circa 1950 where investigations were hands-on and ultra analog. Pleasing is Bruce Bennett as a Harvard lab rat digging among bleached bones and figuring murder behind them, Ricardo Montalban the detective in charge. We know the killer early, but how will they unmask him? Mystery Street’s 93 minutes captivated me as much for on-screen suspense as that arising from whether the disc would finish OK. John Sturges directed, an early and expected good job, atmosphere stoked further by John Alton behind cameras. Frustrating was tepid money Mystery Street earned, $429K in domestic rentals, $353K foreign (loss: $277K), proof again that making a good picture was not enough what with theatres closing, families doing elsewhere things, and television siphoning off attendance. Racket Squad began the same year on tubes, so why go out and spend to watch Mystery Street when so far as most were concerned, it was a same experience?
RECKLESS (1935) --- Nothing odder or more unexpected than a Classic Era star vehicle that simply does not work, Reckless as instance of gilt-edge casting and lavisher-than-lavish appointments that no one (at least of my acquaintance) seems to enjoy. What might have gone wrong was humor in back seat to melodrama, a too distant back, but how’s that possible with William Powell, Harlow, Ted Healy, more among mirth-makers less than funny here. Story was evidently Selznick’s, augmented by numerous others, Reckless factory-made with no pretense otherwise. Too many cooks can and will spoil broth. Trouble is disagreeable device of dipso Franchot Tone buying Harlow’s starring play and then her, Powell lovelorn and left behind, anything but desirable positioning for him. The trio is cast to disadvantage, each seem aware of same, yet stay adrift as narrative lurches toward suicide solution , no satisfactory resolve there, and sour ending to make one regret time entrusted to what seemed foolproof. Selznick was on record as wanting this to match his Dancing Lady of several seasons before, Reckless failing to capture spirit and fun of that backstage frolic. The studio system was a delicate instrument, noways to be taken for granted. Where a picture was made badly, they’d simply remake it, but where the concept is fundamentally wrong, where is ground upon which to repair? Reckless lost money, a shock considering cast alone, so let’s assume word got out-and-loud as to what a cluck it was, or worse, how unpleasant was the get-through. Thrust of narrative is the Libby Holman/Smith Reynolds tragedy, bitter tea for an audience there to be amused by Powell-Harlow who had done so reliably before. TCM runs Reckless in HD, but I’ll be surprised if they offer it on Blu-Ray.
![]() |
My Man Ford with Anna Massey and Jack Hawkins |
GIDEON’S DAY (1959) --- Jack Sprat might have directed this rather than John Ford and we’d get approximate same sort of Brit police procedural starring Jack Hawkins, but note how efficient Ford did this “job of work” against theme and background untypical of the great director, being proof if any were needed that he could rise to occasion of any studio assignment and make magic of material less promising on a surface perhaps, but plenty so where he is at helm. Gideon’s Day pleases the more on repeat mode, as so much goes on that I tend to forget between always pleasurable screenings. A day in busy life that is Gideon's, he deals with thefts, murder, humor back at the Yard (never time enough to eat or pick up groceries for an evening meal he’ll miss), this is Ford at quick tempo I’d expect more from early, even starting days, so don’t mistake this for old man effort at twilight juncture. Serve Gideon’s Day to civilian diners and hear them exalt Ford for level of energy not expected perhaps, colonies the poorer for Columbia distributing black-and-white prints in 1959 (retitled Gideon of Scotland Yard), this a show particularly striking in color which was intended and carefully designed for. Was Ford aware how compromised Gideon’s Day was on domestic screens? Maybe he wasn’t told, or cared less if he was. Filmmakers grew alligator hide for vandalism inflicted on output, being John Ford with mantle-full of awards no assurance you’ll not be next to the chipper. Stock folk are here if in lesser number, Anna Lee the wife to Hawkins, sense made for her being Brit and a veteran of UK features before she became acquainted with Ford. It’s said Ford staged a lifelong Irish rebellion vs. the Isles, yet there’s no taking to task of English habits or lifestyle here. Gideon’s Day is genre pure/simple and thrives at it … makes me wish Ford had done a series of Gideon thrillers. Indicator has a lovely Blu-Ray (region free) as part of a Ford box, and there are nice extras.
9 Comments:
Dan Mercer speculates on disc rot and MYSTERY STREET:
DVD rot?
Perhaps it's a variation on the philosophical conundrum, "Does a tree falling in the forest make a sound if there is no one to hear?"
Does your DVD rot if you're dead?
I suppose if you have heirs who have long coveted your DVD collection and other movie things, it would make a difference. On the other hand, if you are a friendless collector whose remains are discovered several weeks past your due date, it is probably no more than a moot question.
As for "Mystery Street," I've enjoyed it, but for all the interest packed into its running time, there really isn't anything that made it special enough for someone to turn off the Magnavox and venture out to a theater. The cast does well, but who are they? Not big names certainly. The production is careful and detailed, the direction interesting, but that only contributed to the dismal bottom line.
Sally Forrest, however, is one name special to me. She's very good in everything I've seen her in, terribly cute, a good singer and dancer, but so tiny. Maybe that was what prevented her from becoming a star, not enough Alan Ladds to go around.
Not dvd rot exactly; but I recently took a set of blurays down from the shelf, a package which had those cardboard-sleeve holders, like the pages of a book, with a separate disc within each - and was shocked to find the discs had all slid down further into their sleeves, at the bottom of which there was some excess glue or mucilage which had been used in the manufacturing of the set; and which gunk was now encrusted on the bottom edge of all of the discs.
Overnight soaking in dishwashing soap and lukewarm water and some gentle rubbing with a soft cloth removed the gunk, and the discs I've looked at have played well, so far - but it does go to show that maybe people should take the discs at least out of their packages and just inspect them once in a while.
The Mystery Street/Act Of Violence dvd was one of my first discs to "rot". I got a replacement, because Mystery Street is such a terrific, under-rated film. MGM really gave Ricardo Montalban some good chances (see the superb Border Incident and the less successful Right Cross), but sadly they just did not click at the time. MGM dropped him after Latin Lovers in 1953.
If you think Reckless is disappointing (which it is) then avoid Jean Harlow's subsequent film Personal Property. It was an incredibly boring film to watch.
Regarding Veronica Lake - Google her Dick Cavett interview from shortly before she died. She's incredibly modern and unaffected; it is a frustrating watch though, because Cavett did not seem too prepared (or interested) in her.
Many years ago Warners (not Warners Archive) released a box set of Comedy Team features - two with Laurel and Hardy, two with Abbott and Costello, two with the Stooges. Word got out just a few years later that these things were not ageing well. For one reason or other, I had two sets and both played well so I took the story with a grain of salt. But ultimately I had discs in both sets go sour!!!
I've had individual cartoons go bad; one on a Loony Tunes collection and one on a Popeye collection. Read somewhere that this was an issue common to certain Warner discs pressed in Mexico. Anyone see similar flaws on VOD discs? Or on other brands?
More importantly: Especially early on, some of Hollywood's propaganda eventually proved to understate the horrors playing out abroad. There was a Ken Burns documentary series, "The War", that focused on living witnesses who experienced it on the front lines or on the home front. The war in the Pacific was especially brutal because both sides believed the other to be literally less than human, and treated them accordingly. That attitude was explored in an essay by Paul Fussell, "Thank God for the Atom Bomb" (collected in a book by that title). Fussell, himself a WWII vet, argued that a land war in Japan would have more barbaric, more horrific and more drawn out than the carnage wrought by the bomb.
As to cases of actual 'DVD rot', I have thankfully but rarely come across it if at all; other than the times a simple cleaning has cleared up the problem, there have been a couple of instances where I've come across discs which would not play on one player but which would play well on another; however, there were in fact two blu-rays, not dvds, from Criterion - a fine outfit, I hasten to add - which turned out to be unplayable, Roeg's 'Walkabout' and Lang's 'M'; and as both had been on my shelf for too long before I got around to trying to view them, I found myself well outside the "return window" for easy returns.
Though I do suspect that these two were more a case of "manufacturing defect" rather than of classic, passage-of-time-related, "dvd rot".
I highly recommend Veronica Lake's autobiography. She is very no-nonsense and her story is fascinating. She also has some replies to the people who found her "difficult." I often walk by the very pub in NYC where she worked in her old age, and think fondly of her for a moment or two. Her final scene in "So Proudly We Hail" is one of the genuinely shocking studio era scenes Ive witnessed... I was not expecting it.
re "dvd rot"....My "Mystery Street" and "Crime Wave" DVDs won't play. Maybe something in the manufacturing of that Noir set was off.
It turns out I have a copy of "Mystery Street", as it is part of a "Film Noir" set which I inherited from a late relation; from the packaging, it looks like that set came out in 2007, and I suppose it would have been purchased at around that time. I don't think any of these discs have come out of their cases to see the light of day since I inherited them a few years ago; and I don't know if in fact my late relation ever actually watched these, though I'm sure that he would have done so.
After finding the movie, and then reading the above comments re: "dvd rot", I became very nervous about what condition the disc might be in, so I decided to watch it right away.
So I'm now happy to report that 'Mystery Street' was a fine movie with, in my opinion, a weak and generic title which couldn't have helped its marketing very much when it was released; and more importantly, that the disc played without any problems at all. I've not yet watched the feature it shares its disc with, 'Act of Violence' - but when I do, and if it's not in good order, I'll let y'all know about it.
Dan Mercer appreciates SO PROUDLY WE HAIL:
There is a poster shown advertising a double feature of "So Proudly We Hail" and "Wake Island." Both were in a sense propaganda films, in that each had a similar purpose, to put a spin on the defeats our country suffered early in the war so that we would be strengthened in our resolve to continue the fighting. But defeat remains defeat, after all. I can only imagine what an audience would have felt, having to go through a double dose of that. Spiritual uplift might have become elusive, with a Japanese boot coming down upon an American face again and again.
"So Proudly We Hail" is the better of the two, "Wake Island" beginning as a standard military comedy after the "Here Comes the Navy" model, with the enlisted men involved in various hijinks until all are given an opportunity to go down fighting, Alamo-style, against overwhelming odds. The perspective of "So Proudly We Hail" is that of the nurses serving behind the lines, allowing a more finely detailed view of the confusion surrounding the first days of the war, the lack of adequate supplies or planning, and the constant encroachment of the Japanese as the American and Philippine troops are forced to retreat along the Bataan peninsula. The depictions of Japanese attacks are often harrowing and the death of the character played by Veronica Lake is especially shocking.
At that, however, it is not an entirely satisfactory movie. The soldiers drift away from their lovers but return, as though the distance was never greater than the backstage or wings, and every quarter hour or so there is a speech in which someone sums up the decency of American values or the limitless depths of the American fighting spirit. No doubt the latter should be expected, given that even in 1943, when the movie was released, our eventual victory was by no means certain.
The acting is skillful and sincere, but with one exception, the actors and actresses seem to be playing their characters rather than living them. That exception, as you noted, is the performance of Veronica Lake. There is a rawness to it that owes less to the screenplay than to a heart fully engaged with the trials faced by her character. Her last scene is especially haunting, her face shadowed by a terrible sadness as she almost reluctantly walks towards her death. Here there is no posture of grim determination, as might have been found in another picture made at this time, but only regret, for the sacrifice is being made not out of bitterness or hatred, but love. She had left behind her earlier despair and now wanted only to save those from whom she would never have wanted to be parted, as she would be in just a moment, perhaps forever. But she had taken up the cup and could not lay it aside.
If "So Proudly We Hail" was lacking in any other way, still, this scene would have justified it.
Post a Comment
<< Home