Sigma Sampling #2
![]() |
| Not Looking for Friends, Let Alone a Designing Woman and Her Clingy Kid |
Alone Again, Naturally: Hondo and No Name on the Bullet
HONDO (1953) --- John Wayne enters Hondo with a gun and a dog and that’s as much as any Sigma male needs. It is for narrative with help of romantic interest Geraldine Page and her boy Lee Aaker to show Hondo he’s wrong and that domesticity is, or should be, the life for him. To go it alone in the fifties was bad as to shirk during wartime. Hondo looks dangerous as he approaches under the credits, a threat accentuated by 3-D. I must imagine that effect for not yet seeing Hondo in depth (why, oh why … not?). “Angie Lowe” runs for her gun at the sight of Hondo with his mangy dog sporting a deep scar across the bridge of its nose. These are loners of a wasteland but can-dos in a pinch. Per customary in films, especially postwar, they need but to be brought round to service of a woman, her child, her community. Angie is not long recognizing Hondo for a suitable successor to her worthless husband. Latter is Leo Gordon, who really is Hondo in extremis, a natural outcome of anti-social attitudes Hondo has so far shown. “Ed Lowe” is foul-tempered and a back-shooter. He even kicks “Sam,” Hondo’s dog who is uncredited. Ed Lowes of the world are what postwar adjustment was meant to smooth out. If Ed won’t straighten up, then there is Hondo to do harsh job of disposal, in self-defense mind, but getting it done all the same because a civilization he’ll soon be incorporated into must be protected. Hondo is a Sigma with a target painted upon his back, a sitting duck for Angie, little “Johnny Lowe,” even Apache chief “Vittorio” who has specific ideas of how Hondo must be domesticated. Hondo is plain spoken to Angie, insulting her even, this only digging his hole deeper. She’ll observe how well he sharpens an ax edge, shoes a horse, all the while appraising him for ranch duty on her and Johnny’s behalf. “That’s wonderful!” she says when Hondo mentions that he has a place in California, her by now measuring drapes to decorate it. Hondo shows Johnny a quick way to learn swimming, but we know by now it is Hondo’s Sigma way of life that will drown. His talk to Angie about a man functioning best alone will serve her countermoves toward taming his anti-social, anti-family, position. So Hondo doesn’t like Angie to feed Sam because Sam should be self-reliant like him? That won’t last past eighty-three minutes this movie lasts (for that matter, neither will Sam).
![]() |
| Sigma Men Tend to Trust Their Dog to the Exclusion of Other Humans |
A Sigma male will watch Hondo and think it an endorsement of his way of life. No, Mr. Sigma, think again. Soon as we see Angie dressed well for her guest, we know he’ll be a permanent guest. How these 50’s traps crept up on a Sigma … sometimes with civic pride and three-layer cakes like in Bend of the River, or where Johnny (offscreen) crawls into Hondo’s bunk, “put his arms around my neck, made me feel kinda funny, like he was dependent on me.” Yes, Hondo, he and Mom are by now very dependent on you, especially with Apaches broken bad and white folk having to clear out. Where to now but Hondo’s ranch in California? He and Angie pledge never to tell Johnny that his new Daddy shot and killed his old Daddy, but I bet surely the kid would eventually find out had there been a sequel. Would he then become the problem Rock Hudson’s teenage offspring was in The Lawless Breed? Sigmas watching, truly committed ones, know middle-class servitude comes in on soft cat feet, the tender trap Frank sang about and yielded to. Westerns after the war exalted those who in the end would tend home fires. John Wayne’s Hondo learns his lesson sooner than Tom Dunson in Red River, maybe because Hondo had no sidekick other than Sam, nor a temporary woman available when natural impulses called. Angie will answer these needs, but at a high cost, Hondo’s Sigma principles blown away with a desert wind. Will he have cause to regret a decision not really his own once the three relocate? Hondo won’t address this question. It is enough that by an end credit, he has been roped and put in service to rigid creed that is family responsibility.
![]() |
| Just to Be Straight Here: They Didn't Mark Him for Death ... He Marks One of Them for Death |
NO NAME ON THE BULLET (1959) --- For us to admire a Sigma, let alone adopt him for a role model, there must be virtue back of his silence and withdrawal from mainstreams. Criminality right away robs a man of Sigma status. We wait instead for him to be caught or killed, projecting ourselves upon his exploits only during “fun” parts of Acts One and Two where he does things polite society would deny viewership. Con men thrive, often time prevail, because those they cheat are worse crumbs. Schemers might also form emotional attachment to an intended victim and redeem themselves for a hopeful, if not altogether happy, finish. John Garfield starting out as Sigma in Nobody Lives Forever achieves this, even if we finish in doubt as to his fate. Outright murderers have little chance to survive an end title, whatever their attractiveness or romantic inclination. “Raven” in This Gun for Hire is doomed for acts committed in a first reel, audiences captivated by Alan Ladd’s charisma but knowing they’ll wait for safer follow-ups the new-minted star can survive. Audie Murphy for Universal began as a “kid,” could be handy as a gunslinger but not outright killer, play Night Passage outlaw on Sigma terms if redeemable. Audie Murphy brought Sigma as built-in accessory to all parts he enacted, his sociability having been scattered upon European battlefields. Credibility for conflicted or isolated characters was Audie’s by default, but hold … he had friends and a second marriage that sustained, two sons outcome of that, and we’d like to think family life was relief at least in part from PTSD he had to cope with.
![]() |
| Two Thinking Men Identified So Because They Play Chess |
Audie showed up on What’s My Line and did not even bother to disguise his voice. Sigma. Audie didn’t trust a lot of people, and once he went sour on somebody, there was no going back. Colleague Charles Drake in No Name on the Bullet got on well with him; you can tell it by their congenial co-casting here. Hired killer “John Gant” rides into town to off a man he’s never seen but has been well paid to dispose of. Nothing personal, just simple matter of picking an argument and gulling his target to draw first. Gant stays within the law, and the Code, us to decide based on our own code how bad a man he is to choose such depraved means of earning keep. Audie Murphy as John Gant is heaven-sent Sigma casting. We like this star best where revealing least, 77-minute question being who he’s here to kill and why. He will walk alone and prefer it, has intellect (chess player), is foreclosed from love interest by dint of profession. I don’t know another actor who could have played Gant with such conviction as Murphy. Who else carried such baggage with which to work? Audie Murphy wasn’t acting, he was being. Wiser filmgoers early on detected him for the real thing, his popularity greatest in the South, which as we know, is where wisest filmgoers dwelled and still dwell. State of grace No Name on the Bullet achieves is fruit of Audie alone, it understood that other actors were a little nervous around him, not just for lethal former exploits but for his having tapped into screen presence they’d not known and probably never would. Audie opposite bigger names always came off smelling like a rose, if cactus rose. Watch Night Passage James Stewart do his acting thing while Audie just stands, quietly observes, says little if nothing because the scene is already his. Both men had extensive and heroic war experience, but Jim came home more-less whole, if damaged (hearing), Audie a for-keeps paradox who’d forever define Sigma malehood both on and off the screen.








13 Comments:
Dan Mercer got curious as to who/what uncredited "Sam" was in HONDO ...
Just reading your latest episode and loving it, just as I love "Hondo," a great but criminally neglected film, probably for its lack of auteur status.
However, you write that "Sam," Hondo's dog, is uncredited. I put the question to the DuckDuckGo AI program and got this response:
"In the movie Hondo (1953), the character Sam, who is Hondo's dog, was played by Chuck Roberson. He was primarily known as a stuntman and actor in various Westerns, including his work alongside John Wayne."
I guess Chuck had a side hustle as a Charles Gemora type, specializing in playing man's best friend rather than apes. I wouldn't be surprised if he was the one doing "Nana" in the telecasts of Mary Martin's "Peter Pan" in the 1950s.
Thinking of the Lone Ranger, a Semi-Sigma. He's a crusader not only for justice, but for united, law-abiding communities that can stand up to villains. He lives like a Sigma, rejecting domesticity even while actively preaching it. And he wears a uniform and enforces the law, further binding himself to a civilization he never quite joins.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/article/2024/jun/12/the-sad-stupid-rise-of-the-sigma-male-how-toxic-masculinity-took-over-social-media
Thank you for introducing me to the term "Sigma male". It is another 21st Century, internet creation that I will now try to forget. On the other hand, NO NAME ON THE BULLET is terrific. Probably my favorite Audie Murphy.
Ouch. Looks like I bet on a bad horse.
Sigmas in today's column, a follow-up to thoughts from 8/25/2025, suggest Sigmas go way back, certainly in movies, probably in literature, certainly in life. I'll have no problem identifying more when further Sigma samplings from the Classic Era surface at Greenbriar.
Just enjoyed today, by the way, a heaping helping of toxic masculinity, FOR A FEW DOLLARS MORE.
Was the Lone Ranger sort of a Dirty Harry of his era?
Dan Mercer continues his investigation of Sam/Pal/Chuck:
Perusing the more reliable Google AI, I found that "Sam" was actually played by Pal, the dog who impersonated Lassie in several movies during the 1940s. By the time "Hondo" was made, however, he was nearing the end of his career. Like many actors who played leads early on, he was relegated to a character part in this one, as a dirty and ornery old dog. Google AI also indicates that it was so hot on location that in scenes where he was supposed to snarl in a menacing manner, he could only pant.
No attribution was provided, so its Pal or Chuck, take your pick.
I've been using OWL3D to generate 2D to 3D versions of yet to be released in 3D pictures. HONDO is one I've done. Costs $25 a month (we can get it for $10) and it is worth the experiment as it is fun to use and fun to see the results. Make sure you select POPOUT (took me a while to figure that out). I project the end result on a 150 inch BIG screen. John Wayne demands BIG. This picture demands 3D. Like DIAL M FOR MURDER and KISS ME KATE it is a wholly different experience seeing this in 3D. I am wholly a klutz when it comes to technology. I learn by stumbling. Had some reviewer not dissed the 3D Blu-ray of HUGO we would have had this in 3D.
"Was the Lone Ranger sort of a Dirty Harry of his era?" Not as we have him in any of his incarnations in my view. Those Republic Serials are wonderful. Glad they were saved.
The two most recent movies tried to remake him. "Legend of the Lone Ranger" was obviously meant to package him as a Superman / Star Wars franchise, upgrading Butch Cavendish from a bandit to a powerful, would-be dictator set on conquering America. The Disney version, another attempt at a franchise, not only gave us a disgustingly insane Butch Cavendish but teamed him with a evil tycoon -- symbol of the establishment -- orchestrating a violent coup with even more outrageous set pieces. Plus there was Tonto full of mysticism and the Ranger himself abandoning his iconic uniform for a city slicker black suit.
Nope. Dirty Harry was in the business of cleaning out the punks, officially a cop but rejecting the rules. Lone Ranger respects rules and preaches civilization, but wasn't officially a lawman. And of course those silver bullets reminded him not to be too trigger-happy.
Another thought: Batman as a semi-Sigma. Rather than having nothing to lose, Bruce Wayne has so much he'd be hard pressed to lose it all. And yes, he has a faithful butler, a series of proteges, and the occasional woman who Gets Him. But all of them are enablers, dedicated to supporting his obsessions and never cracking his Dark Knight shell. Being dark and damaged is park of his schtick, enabling him to be cold and merciless where Superman, small-town boy raised by loving parents, projects the Lone Ranger's ideals of doing good for people rather than meting out justice.
I wonder if "dark and damaged" will remain the essential element for Batman, indeed will the character continue to be relevant, even present, say twenty years from now? Someone please remind us at that point to check in and see.
Post a Comment
<< Home